Proc Gas Consum v. FERC

177 F.3d 995
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided August 10, 1999·No. 98-1075·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the district of columbia circuit

No. 98-1075 September Term, 1998

Process Gas Consumers Group, et al., Petitioners

v.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, et al., Intervenors

Consolidated with No. 98-1089

Before: Edwards, Chief Judge, Wald and Rogers, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

It is ORDERED by this Court that the opinion filed on May 21, 1999, is amended as follows:

Page 18, the last full sentence should read:

It is often impossible to offer a higher rate or to request more capacity because the only pipeline capacity that could be of any use to the existing customer is already spoken for.

FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk

Filed on August 4, 1999

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proc Gas Consum v. FERC, 177 F.3d 995 (D.C. Cir. 1999).

177 F.3d 995 (Proc Gas Consum v. FERC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.