Probst v. Town of Wheatfield
This text of 273 A.D.2d 843 (Probst v. Town of Wheatfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, petition granted in part and matter remitted to respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Wheatfield for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the determination of respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Wheatfield (ZBA) denying petitioner’s application for an area [844]*844variance. Supreme Court erred in dismissing the petition. Respondents concede that the ZBA failed to consider the requisite criteria set forth in Town Law § 267-b (3). We therefore reverse the judgment, grant the petition in part by annulling the determination of the ZBA and remit the matter to the ZBA for a new determination of the application (see, Matter of Zelnick v Small, 268 AD2d 527). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Koshian, J. — CPLR art 78.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Hurlbutt and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 A.D.2d 843, 710 N.Y.S.2d 260, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/probst-v-town-of-wheatfield-nyappdiv-2000.