Probst v. State

1991 OK CR 117, 820 P.2d 1353, 62 O.B.A.J. 3442, 1991 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 124, 1991 WL 235261
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Probst v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 62 O.B.A.J. 819
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided November 1, 1991·No. No. F-89-987·Published

Opinion

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR REHEARING

The State of Oklahoma has filed a Petition for Rehearing asking that the Court clarify certain language set forth in the opinion handed down herein on September 9,1991. Now on this 1st day of November, 1991, having examined the Petition for Rehearing filed by the State of Oklahoma in the above styled and numbered cause, and being fully advised in the premesis, this Court finds that clarification of certain language concerning statutory construction is necessary and that the petition should be, and is hereby GRANTED.

The clarification required does not change the ultimate disposition of the case. However, to avoid unnecessary confusion the original opinion handed down in the above styled and numbered cause is hereby WITHDRAWN.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ James F. Lane JAMES F. LANE Presiding Judge

/s/ Gary Lumpkin GARY LUMPKIN Vice Presiding Judge

/s/ Tom Brett TOM BRETT Judge

/&/ Ed Parks ED PARKS, Judge

/&/ Charles A. Johnson CHARLES A. JOHNSON, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Probst v. State, 1991 OK CR 117, 820 P.2d 1353, 62 O.B.A.J. 3442, 1991 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 124, 1991 WL 235261 (Okla. Ct. App. 1991).

1991 OK CR 117 (Probst v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.