Probst v. Probst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Probst v. Probst

262 A.D. 849

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1941

DocketAppeals No. 1 and No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 849 (Probst v. Probst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Probst v. Probst, 262 A.D. 849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal No. 1. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the order of this court, entered April 3, 1941, modifying an order [850]*850of the Supreme Court, entered April 30, 1940, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate an ex parte order of sequestration and modified such order, granted. The following question is certified: Upon this record was the order appealed from properly made? Appeal No. 2. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the order of this court, entered April 3, 1941, modifying an order of the Supreme Court, entered May 28, 1940, which directed the entry of judgment against the defendant, pursuant to section 1171-b, Civil Practice Act, withdrawn by the moving party. Present —■ Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal No. 1. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the order of this court, entered April 3, 1941, modifying an order [850]*850of the Supreme Court, entered April 30, 1940, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate an ex parte order of sequestration and modified such order, granted. The following question is certified: Upon this record was the order appealed from properly made? Appeal No. 2. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the order of this court, entered April 3, 1941, modifying an order of the Supreme Court, entered May 28, 1940, which directed the entry of judgment against the defendant, pursuant to section 1171-b, Civil Practice Act, withdrawn by the moving party. Present —■ Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/probst-v-probst-nyappdiv-1941.