Probst v. McLain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Probst v. McLain

247 A.D. 704

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order denying motion of defendant-appellant to require plaintiff to serve an amended complaint separately stating and numbering the facts constituting each cause of action, and making the complaint more definite and certain, [705]*705and striking out certain allegations of the complaint as sham, frivolous, etc., unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion of defendant-appellant to require plaintiff to serve an amended complaint separately stating and numbering the facts constituting each cause of action, and making the complaint more definite and certain, [705]*705and striking out certain allegations of the complaint as sham, frivolous, etc., unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Probst v. McLain, 247 A.D. 704 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 704 (Probst v. McLain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.