Probst v. Juvenile Office of Cape Girardeau County

Missouri Court of Appeals

Probst v. Juvenile Office of Cape Girardeau County

833 S.W.2d 490, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1272, 1992 WL 185105

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 4, 1992·No. No. 60990·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals from an order of the juvenile court terminating her parental rights in her daughter. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals from an order of the juvenile court terminating her parental rights in her daughter. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Probst v. Juvenile Office of Cape Girardeau County, 833 S.W.2d 490, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1272, 1992 WL 185105 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

833 S.W.2d 490 (Probst v. Juvenile Office of Cape Girardeau County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.