Probst v. Dane

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Probst v. Dane

124 So. 702, 12 La. App. 30, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 709

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedNovember 18, 1929

DocketNo. 11,889

StatusPublished

This text of 124 So. 702 (Probst v. Dane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Probst v. Dane, 124 So. 702, 12 La. App. 30, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 709 (La. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

JANVIER, J.

Plaintiffs sue for a (portion of the real estate broker’s commission resulting from the sale of certain property which was listed with them. Defendant is also a real estate broker, in connection with whom the sale was effected. Defendant contends that there was never any agreement to divide the commission and that under the circumstances surrounding the sale there was no obligation on his part to make a division.

Only a question of fact is involved and a reading of the evidence convinces us that the trial court was correct in finding that plaintiff’s contention was correct and that a division of the commission had been agreed upon.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JANVIER, J.

Plaintiffs sue for a (portion of the real estate broker’s commission resulting from the sale of certain property which was listed with them. Defendant is also a real estate broker, in connection with whom the sale was effected. Defendant contends that there was never any agreement to divide the commission and that under the circumstances surrounding the sale there was no obligation on his part to make a division.

Only a question of fact is involved and a reading of the evidence convinces us that the trial court was correct in finding that plaintiff’s contention was correct and that a division of the commission had been agreed upon.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 So. 702, 12 La. App. 30, 1929 La. App. LEXIS 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/probst-v-dane-lactapp-1929.