Pro-Fire & Sprinkler, L.L.C. and James C. Lankford v. National Funding, Inc.
This text of Pro-Fire & Sprinkler, L.L.C. and James C. Lankford v. National Funding, Inc. (Pro-Fire & Sprinkler, L.L.C. and James C. Lankford v. National Funding, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________
No. 02-21-00232-CV ___________________________
PRO-FIRE & SPRINKLER, L.L.C. AND JAMES C. LANKFORD, Appellants
V.
NATIONAL FUNDING, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 3 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021-001176-3
Before Walker, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Kerr, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
We have considered Appellants’ “Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” We
grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Appellants must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.
Per Curiam
Delivered: December 16, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pro-Fire & Sprinkler, L.L.C. and James C. Lankford v. National Funding, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pro-fire-sprinkler-llc-and-james-c-lankford-v-national-funding-texapp-2021.