Privitt v. State

77 S.W.2d 1113, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 734

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Privitt v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 Tex. Crim. 342 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 16, 1935·No. No. 17453·Published

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

Upon the written request of appellant, duly verified by his affidavit, the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

Upon the written request of appellant, duly verified by his affidavit, the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Privitt v. State, 77 S.W.2d 1113, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 734 (Tex. 1935).

Pincite

77 S.W.2d 1113 (Privitt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.