Privitera v. Lavine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Privitera v. Lavine

45 A.D.2d 915, 357 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4477

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 5, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 45 A.D.2d 915 (Privitera v. Lavine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Privitera v. Lavine, 45 A.D.2d 915, 357 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4477 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination unanimously annulled, without costs, and proceeding remitted for a new hearing in accordance with the following memorandum: This is a proceeding brought pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review, vacate .and annul respondent’s determination, dated January 26. 1973, rendered after a hearing, which affirmed a determination of the Monroe County Department of Social Services’ discontinuance of petitioner’s public assistance grant upon a finding that he refused to accept services of the New York State Employment Service, ^he sole evidence presented at the hearing consisted of an inter-department document of the New York State Employment Service directed to the Monroe Countv Department of Social Services, with attached memorandum containing eonclusory statements of petitioner’s alleged refusal of services of said department. In view of petitioner’s affirmative testimony and evidence adduced at the hearing, the respondent’s determination cannot he said to rest upon substantial evidence.. Nor, can it be said that petitioner was afforded a fair hearing under principles enunciated in Goldberg v. Kelly (397 U. S. 254) and Matter of 125 Bar Corp. v. State Liq. Auth. (24 N Y 2d 174) and cases cited therein. (Review of determination discontinuing public assistance transferred by order of Monroe Special Term.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Moule, Mahoney, Goldman and Del Vecchio. JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination unanimously annulled, without costs, and proceeding remitted for a new hearing in accordance with the following memorandum: This is a proceeding brought pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review, vacate .and annul respondent’s determination, dated January 26. 1973, rendered after a hearing, which affirmed a determination of the Monroe County Department of Social Services’ discontinuance of petitioner’s public assistance grant upon a finding that he refused to accept services of the New York State Employment Service, ^he sole evidence presented at the hearing consisted of an inter-department document of the New York State Employment Service directed to the Monroe Countv Department of Social Services, with attached memorandum containing eonclusory statements of petitioner’s alleged refusal of services of said department. In view of petitioner’s affirmative testimony and evidence adduced at the hearing, the respondent’s determination cannot he said to rest upon substantial evidence.. Nor, can it be said that petitioner was afforded a fair hearing under principles enunciated in Goldberg v. Kelly (397 U. S. 254) and Matter of 125 Bar Corp. v. State Liq. Auth. (24 N Y 2d 174) and cases cited therein. (Review of determination discontinuing public assistance transferred by order of Monroe Special Term.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Moule, Mahoney, Goldman and Del Vecchio. JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.2d 915, 357 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/privitera-v-lavine-nyappdiv-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack