Privette v. Clemmons

145 S.E.2d 13, 265 N.C. 727, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1095
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 1, 1965·No. 701·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER Curiam.

The motion for nonsuit was properly allowed. The evidence utterly fails to support the specifications of negligence set out in the complaint. And there is no showing that the accident was caused by any negligence of defendants. See Fuller v. Fuller, 253 N.C. 288, 116 S.E. 2d 776; Ivey v. Rollins, 250 N.C. 89, 108 S.E. 2d 63.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Privette v. Clemmons, 145 S.E.2d 13, 265 N.C. 727, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1095 (N.C. 1965).

145 S.E.2d 13 (Privette v. Clemmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Greene v. Nichols
161 S.E.2d 521 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)