Privette v. Clemmons
145 S.E.2d 13, 265 N.C. 727, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1095
This text of 145 S.E.2d 13 (Privette v. Clemmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Privette v. Clemmons, 145 S.E.2d 13, 265 N.C. 727, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1095 (N.C. 1965).
Opinion
The motion for nonsuit was properly allowed. The evidence utterly fails to support the specifications of negligence set out in the complaint. And there is no showing that the accident was caused by any negligence of defendants. See Fuller v. Fuller, 253 N.C. 288, 116 S.E. 2d 776; Ivey v. Rollins, 250 N.C. 89, 108 S.E. 2d 63.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Greene v. Nichols
161 S.E.2d 521 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
145 S.E.2d 13, 265 N.C. 727, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/privette-v-clemmons-nc-1965.