Privette v. Allen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Privette v. Allen

55 S.E.2d 188, 230 N.C. 662, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 412

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedSeptember 28, 1949

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 S.E.2d 188 (Privette v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Privette v. Allen, 55 S.E.2d 188, 230 N.C. 662, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 412 (N.C. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

*663 Pee Cueiam.

This was an action to recover the possession of land. Defendant alleged plaintiff held the legal title in trust for the defendant. To the issue, “Is the plaintiff the owner of the legal title to the land,” the jury answered “No,” and the court in its discretion set aside the verdict. Plaintiff excepted to the ruling of the court in declining to set aside the verdict as a matter of law and appealed. Plaintiff’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto was properly denied.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*663 Pee Cueiam.

This was an action to recover the possession of land. Defendant alleged plaintiff held the legal title in trust for the defendant. To the issue, “Is the plaintiff the owner of the legal title to the land,” the jury answered “No,” and the court in its discretion set aside the verdict. Plaintiff excepted to the ruling of the court in declining to set aside the verdict as a matter of law and appealed. Plaintiff’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto was properly denied.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 S.E.2d 188, 230 N.C. 662, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/privette-v-allen-nc-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack