Privensal v. Privensal
67 N.E.2d 580, 295 N.Y. 357, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 827
Opinion
The answer of the defendant-appellant contains no counterclaim, and in the absence of such a pleading, an affirmative summary judgment may not he directed in her favor. We decide no other question.
The order should be affirmed, without costs, and the question certified answered in the negative.
Lotjghban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacheb and Dye, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Privensal v. Privensal, 67 N.E.2d 580, 295 N.Y. 357, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 827 (N.Y. 1946).
67 N.E.2d 580 (Privensal v. Privensal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Castle Garage Corp.
163 A.D.2d 796 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)