Privensal v. Privensal

New York Court of Appeals

Privensal v. Privensal

67 N.E.2d 580, 295 N.Y. 357, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 827

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 29, 1946

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 67 N.E.2d 580 (Privensal v. Privensal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Privensal v. Privensal, 67 N.E.2d 580, 295 N.Y. 357, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 827 (N.Y. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

*359 Per Curiam.

The answer of the defendant-appellant contains no counterclaim, and in the absence of such a pleading, an affirmative summary judgment may not he directed in her favor. We decide no other question.

The order should be affirmed, without costs, and the question certified answered in the negative.

Lotjghban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacheb and Dye, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI