Pritchette v. Trice-Juron Ford, Inc.

107 A.D.2d 955, 484 N.Y.S.2d 370, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42813
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 24, 1985
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 107 A.D.2d 955 (Pritchette v. Trice-Juron Ford, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pritchette v. Trice-Juron Ford, Inc., 107 A.D.2d 955, 484 N.Y.S.2d 370, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42813 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

— Proceeding initiated in this court pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review a determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated November 21, 1983, which dismissed petitioner’s complaint of an unlawful discriminatory practice based on physical disability.

This proceeding was commenced following abolition of the State Human Rights Appeal Board (L 1984, ch 83, § 2) in accordance with the statutory provision concerning appeals pending before the appeal board (L 1984, ch 83, § 4). Petitioner challenges the division’s finding of “no probable cause to believe that the respondent engaged in or was engaging in the unlawful discriminatory practice complained of”.

Petitioner’s complaint alleges that respondent terminated him due to a physical disability. The division found no proof to support this allegation other than petitioner’s claim that he was told he was being fired because he was no longer the person he used to be. The division’s investigation revealed that the employer terminated petitioner for deficiencies in the manner in which he performed his duties. In particular, the employer was dissatisfied with petitioner’s conduct as sales manager in supervising the sales force. The division’s determination finding no probable cause is supported by substantial evidence and has a rational basis, and it must, therefore, be confirmed (see Matter of Comfort v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 101 AD2d 663; Matter of Vola v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 96 AD2d 513).

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Kane, J. P., Main, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Education v. State Division of Human Rights
109 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 A.D.2d 955, 484 N.Y.S.2d 370, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pritchette-v-trice-juron-ford-inc-nyappdiv-1985.