Pritchett v. State
This text of Pritchett v. State (Pritchett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
JERRY K. PRITCHETT, § § Defendant Below, § No. 7, 2023 Appellant, § § Court Below: Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § ROBERT MAY, WARDEN, § C.A. No. N22M-12-031 J.T.V.C.C., § Cr. ID No. 2007013515(N) § Appellee. §
Submitted: March 27, 2023 Decided: April 3, 2023
ORDER
On January 9, 2023, the appellant filed a notice of appeal from a Superior
Court order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and the Court issued a
briefing schedule. The appellant’s opening brief was due by February 24, 2023. On
February 27, 2023, Court staff sent a brief delinquency letter to the appellant. On
March 3, 2023, the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice, sent by certified mail,
directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for
his failure to file an opening brief. On March 15, 2023, the Court received the
certified mail receipt indicating that the notice to show cause had been delivered.
The appellant having failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the
required ten-day period, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)
and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pritchett v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pritchett-v-state-del-2023.