Pritchett, Dlusky & Saxe v. Pingue

690 N.E.2d 550, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1458, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 714
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 25, 1998
Docket97-2269
StatusPublished

This text of 690 N.E.2d 550 (Pritchett, Dlusky & Saxe v. Pingue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pritchett, Dlusky & Saxe v. Pingue, 690 N.E.2d 550, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1458, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 714 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 96APE11-1598. Reported at 81 Ohio St.3d 1421, 688 N.E.2d 1046. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Toth v. Indus. Comm.
688 N.E.2d 1047 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
690 N.E.2d 550, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1458, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pritchett-dlusky-saxe-v-pingue-ohio-1998.