Pritchard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Pritchard v. State

1918 OK CR 113, 174 P. 1182, 14 Okla. Crim. 701, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 205

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 21, 1918

DocketNo. A-3460.

StatusPublished

This text of 1918 OK CR 113 (Pritchard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pritchard v. State, 1918 OK CR 113, 174 P. 1182, 14 Okla. Crim. 701, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 205 (Okla. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, C. Pritchard, was convicted on an information charging that he did unlawfully transport certain intoxicating liquors, to wit, alcohol, from a' point on Red river, south of Oberlin, to the town of Soper, Choctaw county. On the 25th day of Feb-' ruary, 1918, judgment was rendered, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to be imprisoned in the county jail for 60 • days and to pay. a fine of $100 and the costs. He appeals from the judgment. The proof on the part of the state is conclusive arid was uncontroverted. An examination of 'the record discloses that the errors assigned are destitute of merit. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, C. Pritchard, was convicted on an information charging that he did unlawfully transport certain intoxicating liquors, to wit, alcohol, from a' point on Red river, south of Oberlin, to the town of Soper, Choctaw county. On the 25th day of Feb-' ruary, 1918, judgment was rendered, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to be imprisoned in the county jail for 60 • days and to pay. a fine of $100 and the costs. He appeals from the judgment. The proof on the part of the state is conclusive arid was uncontroverted. An examination of 'the record discloses that the errors assigned are destitute of merit. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1918 OK CR 113, 174 P. 1182, 14 Okla. Crim. 701, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pritchard-v-state-oklacrimapp-1918.