Pritchard v. State
This text of 178 S.E.2d 808 (Pritchard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of burglary (Count 1). At trial he submitted evidence of alibi. The trial court gave the jury an instruction that the burden was on the defendant to establish his alibi by a preponderance of the evidence to the reasonable satisfaction of the jury. A charge on alibi substan *781 tially the same as this one was held to be harmful error in Parham v. State, 120 Ga. App. 723 (171 SE2d 911). The recent case of Thornton v. State, 226 Ga. 837, infers that an instruction which shifts the burden of proof to the defendant to prove alibi by a preponderance of the evidence is harmful and constitutes reversible error.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 S.E.2d 808, 122 Ga. App. 780, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 1034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pritchard-v-state-gactapp-1970.