Pritchard v. Pritchard

New York Supreme Court

Pritchard v. Pritchard

4 Abb. N. Cas. 298

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJune 15, 1878

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Abb. N. Cas. 298 (Pritchard v. Pritchard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pritchard v. Pritchard, 4 Abb. N. Cas. 298 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Lawrence, J.

When this application was first presented to me, my attention was not called to the provisions of section 1241 of the Code of Civil Procedure, nor to the case of Howe v. Howe, 5 Weekly Dig. p. 460. Under that section it would appear that the plaintiff’s counsel is right in contending that where a counsel fee, disbursements and' costs, are awarded to the plaintiff’s attorney in the final decree on an action for divorce, they may be enforced by attachment, particularly where an execution therefor has been returned unsatisfied. And see Mr. Throop’s note to section.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawrence, J.

When this application was first presented to me, my attention was not called to the provisions of section 1241 of the Code of Civil Procedure, nor to the case of Howe v. Howe, 5 Weekly Dig. p. 460. Under that section it would appear that the plaintiff’s counsel is right in contending that where a counsel fee, disbursements and' costs, are awarded to the plaintiff’s attorney in the final decree on an action for divorce, they may be enforced by attachment, particularly where an execution therefor has been returned unsatisfied. And see Mr. Throop’s note to section.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Abb. N. Cas. 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pritchard-v-pritchard-nysupct-1878.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack