Pritchard v. Pritchard, No. 31 93 16 (Nov. 25, 1997)

1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 11447
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedNovember 25, 1997
DocketNo. 31 93 16
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 11447 (Pritchard v. Pritchard, No. 31 93 16 (Nov. 25, 1997)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pritchard v. Pritchard, No. 31 93 16 (Nov. 25, 1997), 1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 11447 (Colo. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTEMPTCODED NO. 151 The plaintiff has filed a motion for contempt against the defendant dated April 18, 1997, coded No. 151.

The motion for contempt makes the following allegations:

1. On June 11, 1996, this Court entered a Decree of Dissolution of Marriage.

2. Pursuant to the terms of said Judgment, the Defendant was ordered to pay child support, alimony, real and personal property as appears on file.

3. On November 1, 1996, this Court conducted a hearing and made the following findings:

A. That as of November 1, 1996 there was a support arrearage of $3,600.00;

B. That as of November 1, 1996 there was an alimony arrearage of $2,000.00;

C. That the Defendant owes the Plaintiff CT Page 11448 $303.00 toward unreimbursed medical expenses;

D. That the Defendant was in willful violation of an Order of the Court and was found to be in contempt of the Court;

E. That the Plaintiff was ordered to pay $1,660.00 in Counsel fees for her Florida attorney and $385.00 in Counsel fees for her Connecticut attorney;

F. That the Defendant was ordered to pay to the Plaintiff $1,200.00 for his failure to turn over the Tractor-Mower and $2000.00 for having removed the furniture from the Florida property;

G. That the Defendant was ordered to execute a Promissory Note secured by a Mortgage Deed on 8844 Parliament Court property, Florida;

H. That one-half of the value of any cash surrender value on his Life Insurance policy was ordered to be turned over to the Plaintiff.

4. The Defendant was ordered to transfer to the Plaintiff the real property located in Florida referred to in paragraphs D-12 and D-13 of the Memorandum of Decision.

5. Despite the repeated requests and demands of the Plaintiff, the Defendant has neglected and refused to execute a proper authorization in favor of the Plaintiff to obtain information regarding cash surrender value of his life insurance policy as required by paragraph D-8 of the Memorandum of Decision.

6. Despite the repeated requests and demands by the Plaintiff, the Defendant has neglected and refused to continue to pay the alimony, child support and to pay the Plaintiff for his portion of the unreimbursed medical expenses as set forth under the terms of the Judgment.

7. The Defendant continues to refuse to comply CT Page 11449 with the above Orders of the Court.

Many of the facts that give rise to this motion are not in dispute. On June 11, 1996, this court filed a memorandum of decision dissolving the marriage between the parties and entered certain orders. The court ordered in part that the defendant pay to the plaintiff, as support, the sum of $180 per week. The court further ordered that the plaintiff provide health insurance for the children and that the parties divide equally any uncovered or unreimbursed health expenses for the children. The court further ordered that the plaintiff transfer to the defendant by quitclaim deed whatever right, title and interest she may have in a lot located in Palm Coast, Florida within thirty days from the date of the decision. The court further ordered that the plaintiff transfer to the defendant by quitclaim deed all of her right, title and interest in property located at 8844 Parliament Court, Kissimmee, Florida within thirty days from the date of the decision. The court further ordered that the defendant transfer to the plaintiff by quitclaim deed all of his right, title and interest in property located at 222 Ethan Avenue, Davenport, Florida within thirty days from the date of the decision. The court further ordered that the defendant transfer to the plaintiff by quitclaim deed within thirty days from the date of the decision all of his right, title and interest in the time-share located in Orange Lake, Kissimmee, Florida. The court also ordered that all of the transfers of the interest in the real estate located in Florida were to be simultaneously exchanged between the parties at the office of the plaintiff's attorney in Florida. The plaintiff was ordered to notify the defendant in writing by registered mail, return receipt or certified mail, return receipt at his address at 8844 Parliament Court, Kissimmee, Florida of the date, time and place when the documents were to be exchanged. An order was further entered awarding to the defendant a building lot located at Cod Fish Hill, Bethel, Connecticut. In the memorandum of decision, the court found that the property located at Cod Fish Hill had a fair market value of $119,900, and a mortgage of $84,606.82 and an equity of approximately $35,300. The court further found that the fair market value of the Palm Coast, Florida lot was $10,000. The court further found that the value of the property at 8844 Parliament Court, Kissimmee, Florida was $80,000 and that it did not have a mortgage on it and, therefore, had an equity of $80,000. The court found that the fair market value of the property at 222 Ethan Avenue, Davenport, Florida was $93,000, that it had a mortgage with a balance of $59,060.62 as of April CT Page 11450 1, 1996, and an of approximately $34,000. The court further found that the value of the Orange Lake, Kissimmee, Florida time-share was $10,000. The court further found that the value of the family home located at 19 Hoyt Road, Bethel, Connecticut was $290,000, that it had a mortgage balance as of May 21, 1996, of $105,152.63 and an equity of $184,847.37. The court further found that the defendant had transferred title to a dual side mobile home in Florida and had received $35,000 for that transfer, and awarded that money to the defendant.

The amount of support that was ordered was $180 per week. Also, alimony was awarded in the amount of $100 per week, to terminate on the death of the plaintiff, the death of the defendant, the remarriage of the plaintiff or the date the defendant executes and turns over to the plaintiff the deeds to the properties at 222 Ethan Avenue, Davenport, Florida together with a bill of sale for its contents, as well as the time-share in Kissimmee, Florida; the court having found that the plaintiff's need for alimony will be substantially reduced when she receives title from the defendant for all of the assets as ordered.

On November 1, 1996, following a hearing on the plaintiff's two motions for contempt coded No. 145 and No. 146, the court entered the following orders.

The matter having come before the Court on this date, it is hereby ORDERED:

that as of today's date, there is a support arrearage of $3,600.00, an alimony arrearage of $2,000.00 and the Defendant owes the Plaintiff $303.00 towards unreimbursed medical expenses. The Court authorizes and will sign a proper order directed to the Newtown Savings Bank to transfer to the Plaintiff whatever balance may be in that account in the Defendant's name to pay the arrearages found. The payment is first to be applied to the support arrearage and then to the extent there are any funds leftover, the unreimbursed medical expenses amount and then the alimony amount. Interest is to run on these three amounts at 10% per annum.

that the Court finds that the Defendant is CT Page 11451 in willful violation of a Court order and finds him to be in contempt of Court. The Plaintiff is awarded $1,660.00 in counsel fees for her Florida attorney Michael Resnick and $385.00 in counsel fees for her Connecticut attorney David Ball.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alexander v. United States
409 A.2d 618 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1979)
Marcil v. Marcil
494 A.2d 620 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1985)
Bunche v. Bunche
650 A.2d 917 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 11447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pritchard-v-pritchard-no-31-93-16-nov-25-1997-connsuperct-1997.