Pritchard v. Loancare, LLC
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________________
TAMMY PRITCHARD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) No. 1:20-cv-2356-STA-jay ) LOANCARE, LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) )
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT
Defendant filed a motion to dismiss on July 15, 2020. (ECF No. 11.) On August 5, 2020, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. (ECF No. 12.) The amended complaint supersedes the original complaint, thus making the motion to dismiss the original complaint moot. See Parry v. Mohawk Motors of Mich., Inc., 236 F.3d 299, 306 (6th Cir. 2000) (holding that the amended complaint supersedes all previous complaints and becomes the operative pleading). Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ S. Thomas Anderson S. THOMAS ANDERSON CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Date: August 6, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pritchard v. Loancare, LLC (Pritchard v. Loancare, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.