Pritchard v. Childs
This text of 175 S.E. 908 (Pritchard v. Childs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
J. D. Childs, as trustee in bankruptcy for Paramount Dairy Company, instituted an action against C. E. Pritchard, E. B. Pritchard, S. W. Allen, E. J. Hudson, Southland Dairy Cor[388]*388poration, and Southern Grocery Stores Inc., seeking to recover $10,000 as the value of the capital stock of the Paramount Dairy Company, a corporation, which, as the petition as amended alleged, the defendants issued and caused to be issued without any consideration being paid to or received by the corporation; also to recover $20,000 as the value of assets and funds of the corporation, alleged to have been fraudulently converted by the defendants to their use and benefit. The defendants interposed demurrers which the court overruled. All of the defendants, except the Southern Grocery Stores Inc., filed exceptions pendente lite. The Southern Grocery Stores Inc. filed a direct bill of exceptions, on which the judgment of the trial court was reversed. Southern Grocery Stores Inc. v. Childs, 174 Ga. 888 (164 S. E. 766), where the allegations of the petition as amended are sufficiently stated. Subsequently the case proceeded to trial against the remaining defendants, and a verdict for the plaintiff was returned. The defendants made motions for a new trial, which by agreement were consolidated. A new trial was refused, and the movants excepted, assigning error on the judgment refusing a new trial and on the rulings excepted to pendente lite.
There being no allegation that the defendants were subscribers to the capital stock in the Paramount Dairy Company, and no allegation of any contract to pay the amount thereof, no cause of action was alleged for recovery of the par value of the capital stock.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 S.E. 908, 179 Ga. 387, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pritchard-v-childs-ga-1934.