Prisendorf v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Prisendorf v. State

499 S.W.3d 759, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 933, 2016 WL 5030334

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 20, 2016·No. WD 78365·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM

Terry Prisendorf appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after he was convicted of eight counts of first-degree statutory rape, three counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, one count of attempted first-degree statutory sodomy, and two counts of first-degree child molestation. Upon review of the briefs and the [760] record, we find no error and affirm the denial of post-conviction relief. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM

Terry Prisendorf appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after he was convicted of eight counts of first-degree statutory rape, three counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, one count of attempted first-degree statutory sodomy, and two counts of first-degree child molestation. Upon review of the briefs and the [760] record, we find no error and affirm the denial of post-conviction relief. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Prisendorf v. State, 499 S.W.3d 759, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 933, 2016 WL 5030334 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

499 S.W.3d 759 (Prisendorf v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.