Prisco v. Sack
This text of 238 A.D. 871 (Prisco v. Sack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion to vacate judgment reversed on the law and the facts, motion granted upon payment to the plaintiff of twenty dollars costs in five days from the entry of the order herein, and the case set for trial for Monday, April 3, 1933, with the consent of the justice presiding at Special Term. While we think the defendant waived any question as to the power of the court to [872]*872direct that the case be placed on the Special Term calendar for trial before note of issue or notice of trial had been served, we are of opinion that defendants should not be deprived of an opportunity to present their defense. The appeal from the order in so far as it fixes date of trial is dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Seudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 A.D. 871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prisco-v-sack-nyappdiv-1933.