Prisco v. Prisco
110 A. 111, 90 N.J. Eq. 289, 5 Stock. 289, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 274
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.
For affirmance — Tiie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Treno hard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, White, HepPENUETMER, WILLIAMS, GARDNER — 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Prisco v. Prisco, 110 A. 111, 90 N.J. Eq. 289, 5 Stock. 289, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 274 (N.J. 1919).
110 A. 111 (Prisco v. Prisco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Amratlal C. Bhagat v. Bharat A. Bhagat (068312)
84 A.3d 583 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2014)
TURRO EX REL. TURRO v. Turro
120 A.2d 52 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Michalski v. Michalski
89 A.2d 722 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Strong v. Strong
36 A.2d 410 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Hill v. Lamoreaux
30 A.2d 833 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)
Ringold v. Ringold
116 A. 690 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1922)