Prisco v. Community School Board 31

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Prisco v. Community School Board 31

226 A.D.2d 467, 640 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3581

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 8, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 226 A.D.2d 467 (Prisco v. Community School Board 31) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prisco v. Community School Board 31, 226 A.D.2d 467, 640 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a combined proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and action for a judgment declaring the appellants to be in civil contempt, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Amann, J.), dated February 21,1995, which declared the appellants to be in civil contempt and directed that a hearing be held on the matter of costs and damages.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Amann at the Supreme Court.

The question as to whether the appellants intended to disobey a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated January 7, 1985, is not relevant to the finding of civil contempt (see, Walter Doors v Greenberg, 151 AD2d 550). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a combined proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and action for a judgment declaring the appellants to be in civil contempt, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Amann, J.), dated February 21,1995, which declared the appellants to be in civil contempt and directed that a hearing be held on the matter of costs and damages.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Amann at the Supreme Court.

The question as to whether the appellants intended to disobey a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated January 7, 1985, is not relevant to the finding of civil contempt (see, Walter Doors v Greenberg, 151 AD2d 550). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 A.D.2d 467, 640 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prisco-v-community-school-board-31-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack