Priscilla Scarborough v. Dr. Ridley, Anne Downes, Warden

Fourth Circuit

Priscilla Scarborough v. Dr. Ridley, Anne Downes, Warden

817 F.2d 102, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5251, 1987 WL 37234

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 22, 1987

Docket86-6824

StatusUnpublished

This text of 817 F.2d 102 (Priscilla Scarborough v. Dr. Ridley, Anne Downes, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Priscilla Scarborough v. Dr. Ridley, Anne Downes, Warden, 817 F.2d 102, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5251, 1987 WL 37234 (4th Cir. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

817 F.2d 102
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Priscilla SCARBOROUGH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Dr. RIDLEY, Defendant-Appellee,
Anne Downes, Warden, Defendant.

No. 86-6824.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 29, 1987.
Decided April 22, 1987.

Before RUSSELL, WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Priscilla Scarborough, appellant pro se.

Mary Moffett Hutcheson Priddy, McGuire, Woods & Battle, for appellee.

PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the magistrate. Scarborough v. Ridley, C/A No. 86-525-R (E.D.Va., Dec. 9, 1986).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI