PRISCILLA MARTINEZ and LUCAS BOTAZINI v. CLAITON RODRIGUES
This text of PRISCILLA MARTINEZ and LUCAS BOTAZINI v. CLAITON RODRIGUES (PRISCILLA MARTINEZ and LUCAS BOTAZINI v. CLAITON RODRIGUES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
PRISCILLA MARTINEZ and LUCAS BOTAZINI, Appellants,
v.
CLAITON RODRIGUES, SERGIO MARTINEZ and ROBERT ALENCAR, Appellees.
No. 4D19-3140
[October 22, 2020]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; David A. Haimes, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 18- 009027(08).
Yechezkel Rodal and Kristen Montgomery of Rodal Law, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
Kenneth A. Gordon, Brent V. Trapana and Benjamin Sunshine of Brinkley Morgan, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Claiton Rodrigues.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, MAY and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
PRISCILLA MARTINEZ and LUCAS BOTAZINI v. CLAITON RODRIGUES, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/priscilla-martinez-and-lucas-botazini-v-claiton-rodrigues-fladistctapp-2020.