Priour v. Colbold
This text of 1 N.C. 219 (Priour v. Colbold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is so, for they carry a scandal with them, and there is a certainty of person. Aliter, if the person was uncertain. As one of you is a thief no action lies. In Norfolk they found out a trick to scandalize men, by saying: I dreamed, &c. that you stole a horse, which is a devise to avoid an action. By this means, any one may abuse another with impunity. The disallowance of the answer is nothing. For it is good for the residue.
I doubt whether an action lies in this case, for the words are contradictory. In as much that if he justifies his answer, there is no scandal.
I am clearly of the opinion of my brother Jones. To justify is to affirm.
Afterwards a doubt arose; as the plaintiff had not averred that he had justified his answer after the words spoken. But he had judgment. 1 Roll. 78. 2 Cr. 350.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 N.C. 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/priour-v-colbold-circtnc-1793.