Priour v. Colbold
Opinion
It is so, for they carry a scandal with them, and there is a certainty of person. Aliter, if the person was uncertain. As one of you is a thief no action lies. In Norfolk they found out a trick to scandalize men, by saying: I dreamed, &c. that you stole a horse, which is a devise to avoid an action. By this means, any one may abuse another with impunity. The disallowance of the answer is nothing. For it is good for the residue.
I doubt whether an action lies in this case, for the words are contradictory. In as much that if he justifies his answer, there is no scandal.
I am clearly of the opinion of my brother Jones. To justify is to affirm.
Afterwards a doubt arose; as the plaintiff had not averred that he had justified his answer after the words spoken. But he had judgment. 1 Roll. 78. 2 Cr. 350.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1 N.C. 219 (Priour v. Colbold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.