Priory v. Anderson
This text of 156 So. 22 (Priory v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— This cause coming on to be heard upon the motion of appellant, Frank D. Priory, to reinstate the above entitled cause which has heretofore been dismissed by this Court on motion of appellees and the Court having fully considered all of the causes and things presented as grounds or causes for reinstatement, is of the opinion that the motion to reinstate should not be granted for the reason that a- cursory inspection of the transcript of the record has revealed that no reversible error was committed with *779 respect to the' order of March 4, 1933, which is the sole order appealed from, therefore the motion to reinstate is denied.
Motion to reinstate dismissed cause denied.
Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 So. 22, 114 Fla. 778, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/priory-v-anderson-fla-1934.