Prior v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Prior v. State

525 So. 2d 1023, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1336, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2256, 1988 WL 54541

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 1, 1988

DocketNo. 86-3114

StatusPublished

This text of 525 So. 2d 1023 (Prior v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prior v. State, 525 So. 2d 1023, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1336, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2256, 1988 WL 54541 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends that he was sentenced pursuant to a scoresheet never adopted as law by the legislature and that the proper scoresheet would have resulted in less points and a lower sentence range. Appellee concedes error.

Accordingly, the sentence is reversed and the cause remanded for resentencing using the proper scoresheet. Otherwise, affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends that he was sentenced pursuant to a scoresheet never adopted as law by the legislature and that the proper scoresheet would have resulted in less points and a lower sentence range. Appellee concedes error.

Accordingly, the sentence is reversed and the cause remanded for resentencing using the proper scoresheet. Otherwise, affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and HALL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

525 So. 2d 1023, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1336, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2256, 1988 WL 54541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prior-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.