Priola v. City of New York

237 A.D. 827

This text of 237 A.D. 827 (Priola v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Priola v. City of New York, 237 A.D. 827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the plaintiff established a prima jade [828]*828ease that the street in question was a public street, and that the defendant offered no evidence to the contrary. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty and Davis, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., dissents on authority of Nichols Copper Co. v. Connolly (208 App. Div. 667; affd., 240 N. Y. 596), and eases cited therein at page 677.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nichols Copper Company v. Connolly
148 N.E. 720 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)
Nichols Copper Co. v. Connolly
208 A.D. 667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 A.D. 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/priola-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1932.