Prinzi v. Cataldo
This text of 110 N.Y.S. 1054 (Prinzi v. Cataldo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action was brought to recover for sales of macaroni made by plaintiff to defendant. The defense was payment; the answer admitting the sales, but pleading payment, and averring that there were three separate sales, instead of two, as alleged in the complaint. The bill of particulars showed three sales.
The defendant produced two checks and two receipted bills. Defendant claimed that he paid one of the bills in cash, and the issue was as to the payment of this item. Defendant now claims that he has found in his store a receipt showing payment of this item. While the defendant may not have brought himself technically within the rules as to obtaining a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, we are satisfied that, in the furtherance of the ends of justice, defendant should be allowed to produce this receipt at the trial of the action.
The order should therefore be affirmed, but without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 N.Y.S. 1054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prinzi-v-cataldo-nyappterm-1908.