Printz v. People
3 N.W. 306, 42 Mich. 144, 1879 Mich. LEXIS 731
Opinion
The witness, Mary McKenzie, was competent to give the, value of her seal-skin cloak. It was part of her personal apparel, which she had worn one winter. She testified that she had priced such articles, and that this one was certainly worth one hundred and twenty-five dollars. The evidence was regular and within previous decisions. It was not necessary to call dealers in second-hand furs.
The remaining objection is covered by Cummins v. The People, just decided, ante, p. 142.
There is no error and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Printz v. People, 3 N.W. 306, 42 Mich. 144, 1879 Mich. LEXIS 731 (Mich. 1879).
3 N.W. 306 (Printz v. People) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Clemons
282 N.W.2d 838 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1979)
Duma v. Janni
182 N.W.2d 596 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1970)
Stern v. United States. Giordano v. United States
204 F.2d 647 (Sixth Circuit, 1953)
Gloeser v. Moore
278 N.W. 781 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1938)
Cohen v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.
225 N.W. 549 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1929)
Kavanagh v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
221 N.W. 119 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1928)
Allen v. Commonwealth
146 S.W. 762 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1912)
Withey v. Pere Marquette Railroad
104 N.W. 773 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1905)
State v. Maggard
61 S.W. 184 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1901)
McMahon v. City of Dubuque
77 N.W. 517 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1898)
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Palmer
55 Neb. 559 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)
Alt v. California Fig Syrup Co.
19 Nev. 118 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1885)
Yost v. Conroy
92 Ind. 464 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1883)