Printz v. People

Michigan Supreme Court

Printz v. People

3 N.W. 306, 42 Mich. 144, 1879 Mich. LEXIS 731

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 30, 1879

StatusPublished

Cited by15 cases

This text of 3 N.W. 306 (Printz v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Printz v. People, 3 N.W. 306, 42 Mich. 144, 1879 Mich. LEXIS 731 (Mich. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

Graves, J.

The witness, Mary McKenzie, was competent to give the, value of her seal-skin cloak. It was part of her personal apparel, which she had worn one winter. She testified that she had priced such articles, and that this one was certainly worth one hundred and twenty-five dollars. The evidence was regular and within previous decisions. It was not necessary to call dealers in second-hand furs.

The remaining objection is covered by Cummins v. The People, just decided, ante, p. 142.

There is no error and the judgment is affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI