Printz v. Campbell

City of New York Municipal Court

Printz v. Campbell

27 Misc. 813, 57 N.Y.S. 1145

DecidedMarch 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 27 Misc. 813 (Printz v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Printz v. Campbell, 27 Misc. 813, 57 N.Y.S. 1145 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Hascall, J.

The plaintiffs clearly shaped their, own course as to dealing with the respondent and his codefendant Hotchkiss. They sold and delivered goods with eyes open as to whom they were actually dealing with, and the record but confirms- this statement. We find no error committed by the court below and think the complaint properly dismissed.

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs'.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., and McCarthy, J., concur.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hascall, J.

The plaintiffs clearly shaped their, own course as to dealing with the respondent and his codefendant Hotchkiss. They sold and delivered goods with eyes open as to whom they were actually dealing with, and the record but confirms- this statement. We find no error committed by the court below and think the complaint properly dismissed.

Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs'.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., and McCarthy, J., concur.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Misc. 813, 57 N.Y.S. 1145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/printz-v-campbell-nynyccityct-1899.