Pringle v. Morton Salt Co.

236 N.W. 221, 254 Mich. 179, 1931 Mich. LEXIS 901
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 24, 1931·No. Docket No. 44, Calendar No. 34,838.·Published

Opinion

Plaintiffs as dependents of a deceased employee, their son Harold James Pringle, bring certiorari to review an award in their favor against defendant employer and its insurer.

Thomas v. Morton Salt Co., 253 Mich. 613, negatives right to recover damages for injuries resulting in the death of Harold James Pringle in an action at law by representative of the deceased employee against defendant employer and sustains right to award of compensation. The award is affirmed.

BUTZEL, C.J., and WIEST, McDONALD, POTTER, NORTH, and FEAD, JJ., concurred. SHARPE, J., did not sit. *Page 180

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pringle v. Morton Salt Co., 236 N.W. 221, 254 Mich. 179, 1931 Mich. LEXIS 901 (Mich. 1931).

236 N.W. 221 (Pringle v. Morton Salt Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Morton Salt Co.
235 N.W. 846 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1931)