Pringle v. Gibson
135 Me. 512
This text of 135 Me. 512 (Pringle v. Gibson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pringle v. Gibson, 135 Me. 512 (Me. 1938).
Opinion
The petitioners, plaintiffs in two former actions against the said William E. Gibson (See 135 Me., 297, 195 A., 695), alleging error in the decisions therein, seek correction thereof.
Having given due and full consideration to their contentions, the petition is to be denied for the reason that it is amply manifest that no error has been committed. Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pringle v. Gibson
195 A. 695 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1937)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 Me. 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pringle-v-gibson-me-1938.