Pringle v. Gibson
135 Me. 512
Opinion
The petitioners, plaintiffs in two former actions against the said William E. Gibson (See 135 Me., 297, 195 A., 695), alleging error in the decisions therein, seek correction thereof.
Having given due and full consideration to their contentions, the petition is to be denied for the reason that it is amply manifest that no error has been committed. Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pringle v. Gibson, 135 Me. 512 (Me. 1938).
135 Me. 512 (Pringle v. Gibson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pringle v. Gibson
195 A. 695 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1937)