Pringle Associated Mortgage Corp. v. C. M. C. Properties, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Pringle Associated Mortgage Corp. v. C. M. C. Properties, Inc.

337 So. 2d 1225, 1976 La. App. LEXIS 4172

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedSeptember 20, 1976

DocketNo. 10966

StatusPublished

This text of 337 So. 2d 1225 (Pringle Associated Mortgage Corp. v. C. M. C. Properties, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pringle Associated Mortgage Corp. v. C. M. C. Properties, Inc., 337 So. 2d 1225, 1976 La. App. LEXIS 4172 (La. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PONDER, Judge:

Pringle Associated Mortgage Corporation, plaintiff-appellant, appealed a judgment enjoining a sheriff’s sale it instituted. However, Pringle now desires the appeal be summarily dismissed and remanded. It alleges in its motion for dismissal and remand that new developments in the case, such as, defaults in payment, have occurred which would now entitle it to the relief originally sought in the court below, and that this appeal is therefore moot.

The order of appeal herein was timely taken and the required bond was timely filed. However, plaintiff-appellant failed to pay the costs of preparing the record on appeal and the filing fee due no later than three days prior to the extended return day. C.C.P. Art. 2126. Because of this nonpayment, dismissal of the appeal is mandated. C.C.P. Art. 2161; Hunt v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 276 So.2d 900 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1973).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Plaintiff-appellant is to pay all costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PONDER, Judge:

Pringle Associated Mortgage Corporation, plaintiff-appellant, appealed a judgment enjoining a sheriff’s sale it instituted. However, Pringle now desires the appeal be summarily dismissed and remanded. It alleges in its motion for dismissal and remand that new developments in the case, such as, defaults in payment, have occurred which would now entitle it to the relief originally sought in the court below, and that this appeal is therefore moot.

The order of appeal herein was timely taken and the required bond was timely filed. However, plaintiff-appellant failed to pay the costs of preparing the record on appeal and the filing fee due no later than three days prior to the extended return day. C.C.P. Art. 2126. Because of this nonpayment, dismissal of the appeal is mandated. C.C.P. Art. 2161; Hunt v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 276 So.2d 900 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1973).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Plaintiff-appellant is to pay all costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

337 So. 2d 1225, 1976 La. App. LEXIS 4172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pringle-associated-mortgage-corp-v-c-m-c-properties-inc-lactapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack