Prindle v. Harris

New York Supreme Court

Prindle v. Harris

1 Wend. 104

DecidedAugust 15, 1828

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wend. 104 (Prindle v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prindle v. Harris, 1 Wend. 104 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

The sheriff is entitled only to 37| cts. for serving the summons, and nothing for the service of the plaint, as distinct from the summons. He is entitled to his actual mileage for service of summons and delivery of the property, but he cannot charge double mileage for these services, nor for two defendants, when both reside at the same place. • The bond is a proper charge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

The sheriff is entitled only to 37| cts. for serving the summons, and nothing for the service of the plaint, as distinct from the summons. He is entitled to his actual mileage for service of summons and delivery of the property, but he cannot charge double mileage for these services, nor for two defendants, when both reside at the same place. • The bond is a proper charge.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wend. 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prindle-v-harris-nysupct-1828.