Princo Corp. v. International Trade Commission [Order 2]

Federal Circuit

Princo Corp. v. International Trade Commission [Order 2]

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedOctober 13, 2009

Docket2007-1386

StatusPublished

This text of Princo Corp. v. International Trade Commission [Order 2] (Princo Corp. v. International Trade Commission [Order 2]) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Princo Corp. v. International Trade Commission [Order 2], (Fed. Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ill United States Court of Appea|s for the Federal Circuit ORAL ARGUMENT ORDER 2007-1386 PRINCO CORPORATION V ITC This appeal is scheduled for oral argument in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the F ederal Circuit, Howard T. Markey National Cou1ts Building, 717 Madison Place, N.W., Washington, D.C.: Date: Wednesday, 03/03/2010 Time: 2:00 P.M. C0urtr00m N0. 201 Argument Time: 30 MIN PER SIDE Counsel for the appellant/petitioned interven0r(s): Eric L. Wesenberg Counsel for the appellee/respondent/cr0ss-appellant/ interven0r(s): Clara Kuehn, A. Douglas Melamed The appeal having been placed on the oral argument calendar, counsel need not submit the statement allowed by Fed. R. App. P. 34(a), setting forth the reasons why oral argument should be heard. Notwithstanding the scheduling for oral argument, the panel of judges that will decide the appeal, upon further consideration, may yet disallow oral argument, under the circumstances set forth in Fed. R. App. P. 34(a), and, if so, counsel will be duly notified by the clerk. An Information Sheet, Notices to Counsel on Oral Argument and Cou1troom Decorum, a Calendar Announcement, and a pink Response to Oral Argument Order are attached Return the pink sheet no later than December 21 , 2009. See Fed. Cir. R. 25(b) regarding facsimile transmission. FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly J an Horbaly Clerk Oct0ber 27, 2009 cc: Eric L. Wesenberg Clara Kuehn, A. Douglas Melamed Charles A. Weiss

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ill United States Court of Appea|s for the Federal Circuit ORAL ARGUMENT ORDER 2007-1386 PRINCO CORPORATION V ITC This appeal is scheduled for oral argument in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the F ederal Circuit, Howard T. Markey National Cou1ts Building, 717 Madison Place, N.W., Washington, D.C.: Date: Wednesday, 03/03/2010 Time: 2:00 P.M. C0urtr00m N0. 201 Argument Time: 30 MIN PER SIDE Counsel for the appellant/petitioned interven0r(s): Eric L. Wesenberg Counsel for the appellee/respondent/cr0ss-appellant/ interven0r(s): Clara Kuehn, A. Douglas Melamed The appeal having been placed on the oral argument calendar, counsel need not submit the statement allowed by Fed. R. App. P. 34(a), setting forth the reasons why oral argument should be heard. Notwithstanding the scheduling for oral argument, the panel of judges that will decide the appeal, upon further consideration, may yet disallow oral argument, under the circumstances set forth in Fed. R. App. P. 34(a), and, if so, counsel will be duly notified by the clerk. An Information Sheet, Notices to Counsel on Oral Argument and Cou1troom Decorum, a Calendar Announcement, and a pink Response to Oral Argument Order are attached Return the pink sheet no later than December 21 , 2009. See Fed. Cir. R. 25(b) regarding facsimile transmission. FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly J an Horbaly Clerk Oct0ber 27, 2009 cc: Eric L. Wesenberg Clara Kuehn, A. Douglas Melamed Charles A. Weiss

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Princo Corp. v. International Trade Commission [Order 2], Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/princo-corp-v-international-trade-commission-order-cafc-2009.