Princeville Canning Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Fifth Circuit

Princeville Canning Company v. National Labor Relations Board

316 F.2d 735, 53 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2228, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5268

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 17, 1963·No. 19290·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Princeville Canning Company, by its petition for review, seeks to have set aside an order against it of the National Labor Relations Board. 133 N.L.R.B. 1232. The Board, by its answer, has requested enforcement of the order. A determination of the question as to whether the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence will control our decision. No need is apparent for a discussion of the evidence which was submitted in the proceedings before the Board. The evidence supports the Board’s findings and its order will be

Enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Princeville Canning Company, by its petition for review, seeks to have set aside an order against it of the National Labor Relations Board. 133 N.L.R.B. 1232. The Board, by its answer, has requested enforcement of the order. A determination of the question as to whether the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence will control our decision. No need is apparent for a discussion of the evidence which was submitted in the proceedings before the Board. The evidence supports the Board’s findings and its order will be

Enforced.

Princeville Canning Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 316 F.2d 735, 53 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2228, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5268 (5th Cir. 1963).

Pincite

316 F.2d 735 (Princeville Canning Company v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.