Prince v. William Street Realty Corp.

84 A.D.2d 534, 443 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15579
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 1981·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover brokerage commissions, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aronin, J.), entered December 11, 1980, which denied their motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Plaintiff’s affidavit in opposition to defendants’ motion, considered together with his verified bill of particulars, raises triable issues of fact as to whether an oral brokerage agreement was entered into during the period of July through December, 1977, whether plaintiff introduced Hyland to defendants and whether defendants availed themselves knowingly of the fruits of plaintiff’s alleged postoral agreement actions (see Sibbald v Bethlehem Iron Co., 83 NY2d 378, 380-381). Lazer, J.P., Gulotta, Margett and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prince v. William Street Realty Corp., 84 A.D.2d 534, 443 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15579 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

84 A.D.2d 534 (Prince v. William Street Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Peconic Diner
31 A.D.3d 387 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)