Prince v. Walsh & Co.

95 S.E. 976, 148 Ga. 113, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 212
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 15, 1918·No. No. 658·Published

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

As against a sale of certain lands under a mortgage fi. fa. the plaintiff in error interposed a claim as the head of a family, and in support of the claim offered in evidence an order of the ordinary setting apart as exempt certain personalty only. This evidence was rejected upon objection duly made. Held:

1. The documents purporting to constitute the homestead proceedings were not material to the issue, and were properly rejected. They made no reference to the land in question, nor did they contain any plat of the same. Civil Code, § 3378.; Cook v. Hendricks, 146 Ga. 63 (2 a) (90 S. E. 383).

2. Under the evidence the verdict was demanded, and the court did not err in so directing.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prince v. Walsh & Co., 95 S.E. 976, 148 Ga. 113, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 212 (Ga. 1918).

95 S.E. 976 (Prince v. Walsh & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cook v. Hendricks
90 S.E. 383 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)