Prince v. Walsh & Co.

95 S.E. 976, 148 Ga. 113, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 212
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 15, 1918
DocketNo. 658
StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 976 (Prince v. Walsh & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prince v. Walsh & Co., 95 S.E. 976, 148 Ga. 113, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 212 (Ga. 1918).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

As against a sale of certain lands under a mortgage fi. fa. the plaintiff in error interposed a claim as the head of a family, and in support of the claim offered in evidence an order of the ordinary setting apart as exempt certain personalty only. This evidence was rejected upon objection duly made. Held:

1. The documents purporting to constitute the homestead proceedings were not material to the issue, and were properly rejected. They made no reference to the land in question, nor did they contain any plat of the same. Civil Code, § 3378.; Cook v. Hendricks, 146 Ga. 63 (2 a) (90 S. E. 383).

2. Under the evidence the verdict was demanded, and the court did not err in so directing.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cook v. Hendricks
90 S.E. 383 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 976, 148 Ga. 113, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prince-v-walsh-co-ga-1918.