Prince v. State

247 S.W. 863, 93 Tex. Crim. 230, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 317
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 17, 1923
DocketNo. 7170.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 247 S.W. 863 (Prince v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prince v. State, 247 S.W. 863, 93 Tex. Crim. 230, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 317 (Tex. 1923).

Opinions

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for misdemeanor theft; punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars and confinement in the county jail for a period of seven days.

The recognizance is defective in that it fails to state the punishment. Code of Crim. Proc., Art. 919; Vernon’s Texas Crim. Stat., Vol. 2, p. 882; Branch’s Ann. Tex. Penal Code, Sec. 615 to 617.

The State’s motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Renfro v. State
827 S.W.2d 532 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
State v. Harden
613 S.W.2d 700 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1981)
Commonwealth v. Ulsh
68 Pa. D. & C.2d 124 (Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 S.W. 863, 93 Tex. Crim. 230, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prince-v-state-texcrimapp-1923.