Prince v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Prince v. State

1930 OK CR 358, 290 P. 1118, 48 Okla. Crim. 253, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 113

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided August 16, 1930·No. No. A-7550.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Comanche county on a charge of having: unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement for a period of 30 days in the county jail.

*254 The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 14th day of September, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error and no- appearance was made for oral argument.

Upon a careful examination of the record, we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Comanche county on a charge of having: unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement for a period of 30 days in the county jail.

*254 The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 14th day of September, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error and no- appearance was made for oral argument.

Upon a careful examination of the record, we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Prince v. State, 1930 OK CR 358, 290 P. 1118, 48 Okla. Crim. 253, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 113 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

1930 OK CR 358 (Prince v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related