Prince v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Prince v. State

260 So. 3d 1094

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 18, 2018

DocketNo. 1D18-1994

StatusPublished

This text of 260 So. 3d 1094 (Prince v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prince v. State, 260 So. 3d 1094 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition filed on May 14, 2018, is treated as a petition for writ of habeas corpus, and is dismissed. See Baker v. State , 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

Petitioner is cautioned that abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings will result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court or referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See State v. Spencer , 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999) ; § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat.

Wolf, Lewis, and Rowe, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petition filed on May 14, 2018, is treated as a petition for writ of habeas corpus, and is dismissed. See Baker v. State , 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

Petitioner is cautioned that abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings will result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court or referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See State v. Spencer , 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999) ; § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat.

Wolf, Lewis, and Rowe, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 So. 3d 1094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prince-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack