Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Prince v. State

Prince v. State

976 So. 2d 43, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 960, 2008 WL 238508
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Prince v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 964 So. 2d 783 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 30, 2008·No. No. 4D07-4818·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We further admonish appellant that, because of his total mischarac-terization of the sentencing transcript, any further actions of this nature may result in sanctions being imposed by the Department of Corrections. See Rivera v. State, 943 So.2d 973 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat.

STONE, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prince v. State, 976 So. 2d 43, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 960, 2008 WL 238508 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

976 So. 2d 43 (Prince v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rivera v. State
943 So. 2d 973 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)