Prince v. State
613 So. 2d 145, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2010, 1993 WL 36282
This text of 613 So. 2d 145 (Prince v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Prince v. State, 613 So. 2d 145, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2010, 1993 WL 36282 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s convictions but agree with appellant and the state that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive mandatory minimum sentences under the circumstances of this case. See Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992). Accordingly, we remand with directions that the sentences be made concurrent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Daniels v. State
595 So. 2d 952 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
613 So. 2d 145, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2010, 1993 WL 36282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prince-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.