Prince v. Replogle

Missouri Court of Appeals

Prince v. Replogle

437 S.W.3d 393, 2014 WL 3730633, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 798

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 29, 2014·No. No. ED 100226·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Col. Ronald K. Replogle, Superintendent of the Missouri State Highway Patrol, appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Respondent Matthew Prince. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2014).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Col. Ronald K. Replogle, Superintendent of the Missouri State Highway Patrol, appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Respondent Matthew Prince. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2014).

Prince v. Replogle, 437 S.W.3d 393, 2014 WL 3730633, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 798 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

437 S.W.3d 393 (Prince v. Replogle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.