Prince v. Prince

282 N.W. 228, 286 Mich. 518, 1938 Mich. LEXIS 712
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 10, 1938
DocketDocket No. 46, Calendar No. 40,232.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 282 N.W. 228 (Prince v. Prince) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prince v. Prince, 282 N.W. 228, 286 Mich. 518, 1938 Mich. LEXIS 712 (Mich. 1938).

Opinion

Chandler, J.

Tbe parties to this suit for divorce were married on November 24,1927, and, aside from an occasional separation of a few days duration, lived together until November 27, 1936. One child, now eight years of age, was born of the marriage.

Plaintiff’s bill of complaint alleges defendant to have been guilty of acts of extreme cruelty. The answer denied the allegations of the bill, and, upon hearing, the cause was dismissed by the trial court.

*519 No benefit to anyone would ensue from a recital in detail of all of the evidence offered in support of plaintiff’s case. Briefly, Ms proofs were intended to show that defendant was of a nagging and quarrelsome nature; that she forced plaintiff to live with her relatives; that she spit at him; that on two occasions she threatened to commit suicide; and that several times she had thrown various objects at him, including shoes and a pair of scissors.

Defendant’s testimony tended either to refute the various acts relied upon by plaintiff to sustain his case, or to establish that her acts in the particular instances were provoked by plaintiff’s conduct.

Considering the record in its entirety, it is our opinion that plaintiff has failed to sustain the burden of proof in support of his allegations of extreme cruelty.

The decree is affirmed, with costs to defendant.

Wiest, C. J., and Bushnell, Sharpe, Potter, North, and McAllister, JJ., concurred. Butzel, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McMillan v. McMillan
110 N.W.2d 794 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1961)
Barstow v. Barstow
74 S.E.2d 541 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1953)
Gindorff v. Gindorff
295 N.W. 229 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 N.W. 228, 286 Mich. 518, 1938 Mich. LEXIS 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prince-v-prince-mich-1938.